Tag Archives: australia

People shouldn’t have to die to get here

June 22, 2012

I’m feeling a little conflicted. I firstly want to state that I’m not an expert on the question of refugees, asylum seekers or ‘boat people’. If I get something wrong, please point it out to me.

I hate the fact that people risk their lives to travel in boats that are rarely seaworthy, are overcrowded, with little food or water and a shambles of a crew to come to Australia to apply for asylum or refugee status. More often than not, people die trying to get here.

The thing about our country that is different to so many is that we don’t have any land borders, so people can’t just walk up to the gate and ask to come in to be protected from persecution. A lot of our neighbours in the Asia-Pacific region are either not signatories to the appropriate charters or do not treat refugees and asylum seekers very well, so you can understand why they want to come here.

So how do we get to these people before they get on the boats and put themselves at risk (for very good reasons)?

I don’t know. I don’t have answers. It’s just a question that’s rummaging around in my head and I needed to put it out there.

Australia is a large nation and we can very well afford to assist those who need it. As an aside, I have to wonder how it can be considered cost effective to keep people in mandatory detention when they could be released into the community to work and live until their claims are fully assessed once any issues of security are answered.

I do agree with the concept of ‘stopping the boats’ but only in the sense that we should provide another way for these people to have their claims heard. They shouldn’t have to risk their lives to get the chance to be listened to, assessed and then come to Australia as refugees/asylum seekers (or not if assessed otherwise).

I really want the boats to stop. The people on them should have better options made available to them so that they don’t have to take that massive risk of death just to get to safety. If there were better options, I’m sure they would take them.

This is probably an overly simplistic view. I don’t often speak or write about this issue because it is something that I haven’t had a lot of exposure to. I just hate the stories of people drowning to get to safety. It shouldn’t happen. They should have better options. And as a signatory to the charter of human rights and refugees, we should be providing those better options now. Not tomorrow. Not next year. Now.


Remove the headless fatties from our media

December 9, 2010

It is high time that mainstream media around the world stopped using headless fatty shots with every article or video piece about fat people. I think there are a few reasons why they do this.

  • They know that if they asked people, they would say no.
  • If they have faces, it makes it harder to use them in generalised negative news pieces
  • If the fatty looks happy or really well dressed, they don’t suit a doom and gloom story
  • They won’t get sued for humiliating someone if you can’t identify them by their face

Yet when that person sees this footage of them being used in this way, it can cause pain and anguish become compare. It also dehumanises fat people and gives people power to pick on and attack fat people.

Are you a fatty? Would you like to be a non-headless fatty?

I’m starting a drive to find fat people around Australia who would be happy to be approached by media companies to appear as stock fatty content. Only certain people will feel comfortable about this, so I’m sure that only a few will be happy to do it. But would you like to?

Drop me a line in my contact form and we can go from there. We can start a list of people happy to be contacted by media for this sort of thing. Perhaps you’re also happy to speak to the media on fat acceptance issuse or on how you find being fat in a world that discriminates against you? Let me know – we often get requests through Axis of Fat for people to talk to the media.

All information would be held confidentially and I would contact you to ask you if you were interested and you would contact them. The other thing is I would set up an email list so you could be emailed about things coming up.

Don’t feel pressured to do this. Only a few people will feel comfortable about this, but for those people there needs to be a way to band together and try to get the media to change their ways.


A fat idea

September 13, 2010

I realise the title is a bit cryptic. That’s just the way it is. I have a new idea and I’d like you to hear about it. But rather than write about it, I’ve talked about it. Have a listen.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

(If anyone would like to transcribe this for me, please do. I am pushing stuff up a hill today so won’t get to it for a while…)

ETA: Here is the transcript

Hey. So. You’re listening to this file. Congratulations, you’ve one yourself a prize. And that prize is the chance to listen to me explain to you the idea that I’ve had in the last.. oh..  I’ve had the idea for the last three or four months but I’ve kinda sat on it. And realistically the weekend – the Fat Studies conference has forced me to come out and chat about that idea.

And, what is my idea you might be thinking?

Well you’ve probably heard about Lesley and Marianne doing the fatcast in America. Well, for a long time now I’ve been a very big aficionado of radio and internet radio and podcasting and back in the day I used to actually work for a community radio station which means I’ve got a few skills in regards to audio mixing and editing and things like that. And for a long time now I’ve really wanted to have a podcast of my own. But I haven’t had the guts or the time to really put anything together. But now is the time; now is the time for action. And so I’m here asking you today if you will join me on this journey.

What I want to do is I want to start a fatcast and just to see if whether can do something that is similar to Marianne and Lesley but in Australia. Not just US focused but Australian focused for all those Australian fatties out there who sometimes think that the world doesn’t realise that they’re there. Because we do have a very strong FA community within Australia; it’s just that half the time we never know how to communicate with one another.  So how about communicating with one another through a podcast?

So, my idea is this. That once a week, you know, three or four of us would get together and we’d have a bit of a chat over Skype, so you’d be able to do it from home, and I would record that and that would end up becoming a podcast. We wouldn’t be aiming for any official sort of format per se. I mean there would be guidelines; like we’d probably have an intro and maybe look at some sort of, like, article or something that has happened in the community in the last week or two and then we could all talk about it and discuss it.

Now, so that it’s not a burden what I’ve also thought is that we could have like a rotating cast I guess you could say. So that there’d be three or four of us and I’d be here all the time ‘cause I’ m the one sorta, you know, doing the recording and mixing and all that but we can have lots of different people rotating through the other positions. So like, for example, Natalie, my wife, will be involved one week and then maybe another person and… you know that way it just mixes it up for you guys. Some of you will want to be involved every week, and that’d be awesome, but there’s  some of you that are only going to have like, maybe be able to do it once a month or twice a month. So, it just gives you the option to, sort of, work out what you think you can do.

So where from here? Well, basically the idea is that I want to get one done within the next 30 days. I want to get one trial run done just to see what is sounds like and to see how we are, you know, on the voice side of things and the technology side of things, cause I’ve never done any of this sort of Skype recording. I’ve got some software which I can use which I’ve got a trial for30 days, and that’s why I’ve got the 30 day time frame.  Let’s get it done. Let’s see if we can do it, and let’s see if we can be productive because I think this is really important.

You know, we’ve got the knowledge and we’ve got the backing behind us of our own conviction so why don’t we use that for the good of all the other fatties within Australia who really want to hear an Australian voice.

It’s going to be great to have a male voice on the panel, and if I can find other men to interview along the way that would be great. Also, yes, interviews. I want to find people that we can interview; again we can do that over Skype so we can get people like Charlotte Cooper and lots of other people around the world interviewed from their place at a time that suits them. So we’re not limited by trying to fly people into a studio or stuff like that. So it’s going to be awesome.

So are you interested? Are you as excited about it as I am? I hope so. Because if you are, get in touch. I want you to be on this thing. It’s not just about me, it’s about all of us getting together and having a good chat and a bit of a fun time, but then getting that out there so other people can see just how awesome Fat Acceptance can be.

So I hope I’ve convinced you. If I have, drop me an email or get it to me on Twitter or on Facebook or wherever you can get in contact with me and let’s do this thing.

Cheers.


Hung like a parliament

September 4, 2010

Two weeks after the election and we still don’t know who will be the next Prime Minister of Australia. We’ve had the Green’s Adam Bandt and independent Andrew Wilkie side with Labor, giving them a 74-73 lead in the race for power. However there are three independents left to make up their minds. So what happens if they split and we end up with 75-75?

I can see a few things that could happen. The first thing that happens in a new parliament is that the speaker is elected. The independents would have agreed to vote with the government on supply and confidence votes, but they could still go against them when voting for the speaker. If a speaker is elected, then the side where the speaker comes from will be down one person, as the speaker only votes in the case of a tie. If there is a tie when voting for the speaker, there is no casting vote so they would have to try another candidate. This is the point that we may find that no speaker can be elected, and therefore parliament is borked and new elections required.

Now lets say that one of the independents get voted in as speaker. This would mean that their vote is now gone, since at the first sitting their would be all 150 members. Whoever that independent member was going to side with no longer has their vote in confidence or supply matters, so the other side would be able to form government. Not very stable government though, but it would be something.

So what happens if we get past that point? Well the government of the day would have to make sure that every member of their party was there. No one could go on leave or on trips during sitting days, as that one vote will make a difference. This is basically untenable for anything other than short periods, as at the first opportunity the opposition will force a vote of no confidence. The independents might see this as political gamesmanship and side with the government to block it, even if they didn’t initially side with that party. Then again, they could raise the no confidence motion if they feel that they aren’t being given a fair shake of the sauce bottle.

Interesting times ahead I would say. I think we have to hope that there is a 77-73 final result and that the three independents all go with Labor. It’s the only way we will get some stable government. Bob Katter is looking likely to go with the Coalition though, so we could be in for a rough ride yet.


Information and knowledge is power

August 24, 2010

In the fight against fat discrimination, information is everything. The more informed and better educated on the issue that the public are, the more likely you will have people who can understand the issue and make an informed and considered decision. Sadly, I don’t believe that this is in the interest of government, most medical researchers or business.

Think about it. The more people that think that fat means bad, ugly, defective and wrong the more products and services can be sold to make the fat people good, pretty, working and right again. Medical research companies who are putting money into researching how to make fat people not fat need funding. Funding comes through research which shows that the obesity epidemic is getting worse and that the only way to treat it is with their miracle cure. I have read articles promoting the wonders of gastric banding surgery to find out that the people who make the gastric bands are either providing funding for the research or the doctor being reported on is part of the group.

Weight Watchers, Jenny Craig, Lite’n'Easy and all those sorts of companies want people to fear being fat. If I am happy being fat, I won’t seek out their services. I need to hate myself and loath who I am so I can spend hundreds or even thousands of dollars trying to fix myself.

What I find annoying is when I read another news article about how the obese of the world are ruining the hospital system or putting a strain on services. Like this one. When you read the headline, you find this lovely statement of  “fact”.

Headline - reads "Almost 60 per cent of emergency ward patients in Australia are overweight or obese

Holy smokes Batman! That means almost two thirds of Australians in hospital emergency wards are fat? Err, no. Actually the study focused on a six month period between October 2008 and March 2009 at Melbourne’s Austin Hospital emergency department. Not particularly a large enough or wide enough sample to say “IN AUSTRALIA”. More like “IN MELBOURNE’S AUSTIN HOSPITAL”. Sadly it doesn’t have the same ring to it.

I do wonder why they were doing a research paper into the numbers of fat people attending hospital. Surely they could have just done a quick check of some database somewhere that has all of our information in it (Australia Card anyone?) and just calculate the numbers. Oh no, that’s right. This wasn’t the focus of the study. Or at least the press release, which is all I can access.

Headline of press release - "Obese patients difficult to manage in the emergency department"The study was about the management and treatment of obese people in society. Now obviously the AAP have access to the article in order to get the percentages of fat people in the study. The press release does say though that it was a study of 750 people. 750 people in a hospital in Melbourne is indicative of the fatness of people RIGHT AROUND AUSTRALIA? Get a grip. Even I’m not going to fall for that one.

What gets my goat is that because I’m not part of the establishment, I can’t read the article. I could go to a library to access their online journal catalogue, but then I have to hope that they have access to the Emergency Medicine Australasia journal. I also would need to find some time in my day, when I’m already working, to sneak to the library to check this stuff out. It doesn’t quite work like that for me.

The institutions that want us to discriminate against fat have the tools and resources to tell other people that fat is the evil that needs to be stamped out. They have control of the information. What I want to see is more Australians in a position of power to fight this. This requires people with access to the information to disseminate across Australia and the world.

Why is there not a large group channelling millions and millions of dollars into independent research on this subject? Where are the reports on the independent research I hear about through other channels that shows that obesity is not about the fact that I had too many cheeseburgers this week, but probably the fact that my body was built this way, or through trauma and being forced on to diets as a 12 year old?

I am sick and tired of reading this claptrap day in and day out. There has to be positive stories of fat people and they need to be told. There is a tide of people out there who will happily deride me and put me down because I am fat. I want to fight this and I need the tools. Somebody give me the Rod-damned tools!

The tool is information. It is access to research to analyse it and critique it. It is time to review and understand this stuff. It is the ability to critically assess information and then teach others how to use critical assessment to come to their own conclusions, not just be force fed those of giant corporations or research bodies. In fact, I don’t want you to take my conclusions as “The Final Word”. You should review what I say critically and tell me when I am wrong. Heck, we all learn when society works this way.

Instead of a one way conversation which goes “Hey fat people, you are a drain and are evil and are ugly. Stop eating cheeseburgers!”, what about a two-way dialogue where we all understand why are bodies are the way they are and then come to work out how we get the best of out them no matter what shape and size they are.

Oh, you can’t market that, can you?


Election 2010: Be Informed – know how preferences work

August 20, 2010

I am so sick and tired of hearing stuff like “If you vote for <insert party here> they are giving their preferences to <insert major party here>. So that’s a vote for <prime ministerial candidate here>!” I’m not sure if I can make this any clearer, but:

NO IT’S NOT

Let’s cover voting basics. In the House of Representatives, you number each box from 1 to n, where n is the number of candidates on the ballot.

House of Representatives Ballot Paper example

So whoever you number 1 is your first preference, number 2 is your second preference and so on. The person who you voted as preference 1 does not decide what happens to your preferences. You do!

In the Senate, you have two options. Option one is that you can put a number 1 above the line.

Senate Ballot Paper example - above the line voting

This means that you will vote for their senate ticket(s). Before every election, each party which has a box above the line tells the Australian Electoral Commission how to distribute their votes. So if you vote above the line, you vote will be determined by the party you voted for. This is the only way in which a party or group can do what they want with your votes.

Option two is to vote below the line. This is where you number each box from 1 to n, where n is the number of senate candidates in your state.

Senate Ballot Paper example - below the line voting

In works much the same way as in the House of Representatives. You decide who gets your first preference, second preference and so on. The person you put as number 1 does not decide what happens with your preferences.

I believe that it’s important to be informed, not scared by faceless people telling you that a vote for someone is a vote for someone else. Decide for yourself who will receive your preferences and number below the line. Or at least research the senate group tickets first. I recommend Antony Green’s guide over on ABC Elections. He also has good information on all this preference stuff and how it works.

Be informed. Don’t be fooled.

ETA: Viv pointed me to this brilliant site called Vote Below The Line! It can help you with deciding how to direct your preferences when voting below the line. It asks who you want to vote for, shows you the preferences that they have and then helps you to change them to suit the way you want to vote. Thanks Viv!


Stand up for your rights on Polling Day

August 20, 2010

It’s one day before the Federal Election here in Australia. I’d forgotten what that means until I saw a tweet just a second ago.

Dear P&C members, If you’re not organising a sausage sizzle at your school’s polling booth on Sat you’re un-Australian. Tweet by @ben_hr

Tweet by @ben_hr

Whilst most politicians have been spending the last five weeks worrying about hitting a snag throughout the campaign, it’s Saturday when the focus is really on the snags. And the onions and tomato sauce. Don’t forget the lamingtons, other baked treats and even perhaps some jams or drinks. Polling day is a big money spinner for school Parents and Citizens (P&C) Associations across this big land of ours.

Whilst the nation is worrying about which party to vote for, a team of parents, grandparents and other helpers are preparing to make cakes, biscuits and other treats to sell at the traditional polling booth fundraiser. I’ve seen some great things over the elections that I’ve voted in, including crochet tea cosies and doilies, dolls, handmade clothes, jams, pickles, cakes, drinks and don’t forget the sanga and sauce.

I’m a big sausage man. I love a sausage on a bit of bread, some BBQ sauce and some nice fried onions to go on top. It’s cheap as, hits the spot and seems to have been a part of my voting tradition ever since my first election. So I agree that it is totally un-Australian for schools around this great land to not be organising a sausage sizzle.

Perhaps I need to organise a crack squad of BBQ aficionados to set up sausage sizzles in schools right around Australia where the P&C Association has failed in their responsibility to the voting public of Australia. I have no idea how someone can be expected to turn up to a polling booth and vote, all the while knowing that there is no sausage and bread waiting for them at the finish line.

So with just one day to go, I make this plea to all schools across Australia. Generations before us fought for this country. The very rights and freedoms that they fought for are being trampled on if your school cannot organise a sausage sizzle on polling day. Think about the hundreds of people who are going to come and vote and expect to be able to get a cheap feed. What sort of society are we creating where access to a sausage on a piece of bread is hard to get?


Flashback: National Broadband Network – a quick summary

August 10, 2010

In the first of a number of ‘flashbacks’ to my old blog, here is something that is quite topical. Back in April 2009, I wrote on the Federal Government’s plans for a National Broadband network. Quite relevant given the current debate over the Opposition’s plans being announced today.

The Federal Government has announced the winner of the National Broadband Network tender process. Nobody wins! Yay! I’m sure you’re thinking WTF? right about now, so lets get into some of the details.

The current tender process has been ended and the Government will create a new private-public owned company to spend $43 billion on fibre to the premises. That’s significantly better than fibre to the node. Kevin Rudd calls it “Nation building”. I call it bloody awesome.

The company structure will be such that the Government is majority shareholder and the company will provide wholesale services only. No more monopoly held by Telstra – that surely has to be a good thing. Well worth $43 billion I’d say.

90% of premises in Australia are to receive this new fibre to the premises service, which offers speeds of up to 100Mbps. That is just amazing to think about, considering most of us can get 1Mbps at the most with current infrastructure. The other 10% of Australia receives broadband through “next generation” wireless and satelite services. Speeds will only be 12 Mbps. Only.

It stinks of Nationalism. I don’t care though. Years of neglect of the country’s broadband networks by the current big players means that I’ll happily have the Government own the new network. They intend to sell down their stake-holding in the company within five years (market conditions may vary this) so I’m not to concerned at all. Just give me good Internet.

The low point of the announcement was having Senator Stephen Conroy drone on about the benefits of the package. It seems Kevin Rudd has sidelined him yet again so that he can take the glory. We didn’t need him here now and we don’t need him to filter the Internet.

I wonder whether this will be a way the Government gets their filter into our homes. If they are the wholesaler, they can say “Hey, we decide what you can access. So here, have our filtered feed. Guaranteed to be free of smut and free speech.” That is one worry, but hopefully they will work out the filter isn’t going to work anyway.

The Government also announced immediate funding to get fibre optic backbones developed into major regional centres, such as Darwin, Broken Hill, Mount Gambier and Mount Isa. This is to be done as soon as possible, so hopefully these regional centres will get some competitive broadband services soon.

Perhaps Senator Conroy could use a fibre optic backbone. Might make backflipping easier for him when it comes time to back down from the filter plan.


The future of the Internet in Australia

August 10, 2010

Today we have finally seen the plan of the Liberal/National Coalition for Australia’s future when it comes to Internet connectivity. Today we have seen what the Liberal and National Party plan to do in order to take Australia into the Internet future. That is, move back into the past.

The Coalition has announced that Australians will have access to at least wireless with a peak speed of 12mbps. They also propose that the current Hybrid fibre-coaxial (HFC) network will bring 100mbps speeds to the major centres of Australia. They will also spend money to upgrade exchanges to provide more people with access to ADSL 2+ speaks.

Money will be provided in order to build backbones right across Australia and then grants will be provided to commercial companies to implement their network.

The problem I see is that the Coalition’s plan relies on the private sector to roll out the system. Grants might bring better services to communities, but not to those that are not commercially viable.

Internals of a broadband router

Photo: jepoirrier

Core infrastructure must not be subject to the concept of commercial viability. We don’t build water grids, electricity grids and roads based on commercial viability. Broadband access is not an optional extra but is core infrastructure for the 21st Century.

I can’t imagine that concept of being on a 56kbps Internet connection. There are people in the bush who are on speeds that are slower than this. The technologies and systems being proposed now, such as the e-Health system, requires high speed broadband with both high download and uploads. HFC is not the solution as while download speeds are high, upload speeds are low.

That is just what is being proposed now. Imagine the possibilities for the future if we can have even faster broadband connectivity. If they get it wrong now, the implications for Australia are massive and will be long term.

Edit: ErinAree asked in a comment what the difference was between the Coalition’s plan and the Government’s plan. Since I felt that this was really important, and since I admit I should have covered it in this post, I have included my answer here as well.

The way I see it, there would be some improvement. Just not enough for the future.

Currently in the major cities you can at least get ADSL 2+ high speed broadband. Some people can get HFC which is faster for downloads, but uploads aren’t as fast. But there are many areas that can’t get either of these. HFC is only in limited areas and some new developments were built using phone technology that doesn’t allow ADSL, let alone ADSL 2+.

That leaves wireless for those people. Wireless is expensive and you have to pay for uploads and downloads, which is unlike dial-up, ADSL and HFC. As a main Internet connection it is really the option of last resort.

The Coalition plan to upgrade exchanges to allow more people to access ADSL 2+. They then propose to provide companies with money to extend wireless services to areas that can’t be serviced by other technologies.

Remote communities will be serviced mainly by satellite by both the Government and the Coalition plan.

The biggest difference is that the Government is proposing fibre to the home. This is high speed (both up and down) and will be provided to 97% of all Australians. The Coalition is proposing to provide at least wireless to 97%. So really, the only people who get ‘proper’ high speed broadband are those in the major cities. Which is much like it is now.


One Nation Victoria State President promotes gay bashings on Twitter

August 9, 2010

Over the last couple of days there has been talk on twitter regarding the tweets of Family First Queensland senate candidate Wendy Francis (@wendy4senate). Over this time, many people have pointed out her bigotry to her, which was reported in Fairfax Media  this morning by Ben Grub (@bengrubb).

I sent a tweet this morning to her twitter account after watching her performance on a Sunrise debate (link).

.@wendy4senate Viewed the debate on Sunrise. you are extremely rude and devaluing the lives of gay people and secular society #ausvotes

Tweet to Wendy Francis, Queensland Senate Candidate for Family First

I thought this was fairly respectful but still pointed out my strong belief that her views are bigoted. After returning home from coffee with my mother-in-law this afternoon, I found this tweet waiting for me from John Groves (@h20aquarium). His account says that he is the State President for One Nation Victoria.

@NicholasPerkins I can understand why U are a Phoofter

Tweet from John Groves, State President of One Nation Victoria

I’m sure my wife finds this interesting news.

Reading further, I found another tweet in which he offers his support to Wendy.

@wendy4senate U have a backer in me, love to do some Poofter Bashing from time too time,The Reason as a kid I was abused by such an Animal

Tweet from John Groves, State President of One Nation Victoria

I’m not going to touch his comments regarding what happened to him as a child. It is not my place. It is my place to comment on his comment that he would love to do some ‘Poofter Bashing’.

I was actually concerned that this might be a fake twitter account. There are many that pop up all over the place, so I did some investigation. Searching on the net for “John Groves One Nation” lead me to the website of the Victorian branch of One Nation.

Sure enough, it mentions that John Groves is the state president and that you can contact him on his mobile. So I thought I would. I wanted to confirm whether these were really his thoughts, or the thoughts of some bigot trying to use his name and position.

Here is a transcript of the conversation, taken down by Natalie for me as I recounted it to her after the call. It is as accurate as I can make it, and I have not omitted anything intentionally.

I rang Mr Groves and asked him questions in regards to One Nation’s official policy on gays and gay bashing and comments made on twitter under his name. I indicated I’d gotten his number from the One Nation website, I didn’t troll the White Pages to find his contact, he had made himself publicly contactable.

He immediately sounded agitated and said that I had “well and truly got the message” to which I asked “Is it One Nation policy to promote gay bashing and discrimination against gay people?” He continued to say that I had “gotten the message” and repeated comments made on his twitter account regarding being assaulted as a child by “those animals” and that he will “not stand for gay people” and to “get out of [his] face”.  At this time I asked him to confirm that this is One Nation policy to which he continued to verbally abuse me, assuming I was gay, he indicated once more to “get out of [his] face” and hung up.

So I guess it is his account and I guess they are his thoughts. So therefore I want to hold him accountable for that.

Not only is it abhorrent that you would want to bash someone on the basis of their sexuality, it is also illegal. For a state president of a political party to promote the bashing of any section of society shows a political party that is out of touch with what I expect, and what I suspect most Australians expect of a political party.

I cannot stand by and watch as my friends get targeted by bigots and used as a political football by those who wish to turn the moral compass of Australia on its head. The idea that gay people are somehow lesser human beings, or even animals, is just so far wrong that there are no words that I can find to describe how shocked and appalled I am.

I will stand up to these people, but I can not do it alone. I ask you to please make sure that people like John Groves do not get the chance to get the agenda for this country. There is enough discrimination and bigotry in the world as it is.


Recent Comments

Polls

Have you ever been bullied?

  • Yes, as a child (50%, 4 Votes)
  • Yes, as both a child and an adult (38%, 3 Votes)
  • No (13%, 1 Votes)
  • Yes, as an adult (0%, 0 Votes)
  • I was/am a bully (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 8

Loading ... Loading ...
Join our RSS feed Twitter